On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I > > can implement the dash semantic, but that's another diff. > Hm, that makes the default setup (no /etc/unwind.conf, empty > unwind_flags) always print a warning, which is ugly.
It's not just ugly, it's missleading. We want unwind to be the best it can be *without* a config file. We don't to suggest a config file. We want to steer people away from pushing buttons, not towards. Btw. I'm not sure the parser can work with stdin, I think it needs to seek, which you can't do on stdin? But I might be mistaken on multiple levels. > > Please disregard the diff, perhaps I'll come up with a better idea. > I think the file doesn't exist but it's fine check is in the wrong place. It's also stupid that it doesn't fatal(!) for unwind -f nonexistent. I think this needs to be handled further up in main. Maybe. I'll have a look if I don't forget. -- I'm not entirely sure you are real.
