Florian Obser <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I > > > can implement the dash semantic, but that's another diff. > > Hm, that makes the default setup (no /etc/unwind.conf, empty > > unwind_flags) always print a warning, which is ugly. > > It's not just ugly, it's missleading. We want unwind to be the best it > can be *without* a config file. We don't to suggest a config file. We > want to steer people away from pushing buttons, not towards.
Agree strongly. > Btw. I'm not sure the parser can work with stdin, I think it needs to > seek, which you can't do on stdin? But I might be mistaken on multiple > levels. No, I think it only does ungetc and (nested fd's in case of include if you do that)
