My bad, SBCL uses the libc's wrappers indeed looking at the sources. Le ven. 29 nov. 2019 à 22:41, Josh Elsasser <j...@elsasser.org> a écrit : > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:12:10AM +0100, Thomas de Grivel wrote: > > Maybe Go is not the only problem, I see SBCL compiling syscalls too. > > > > Truth is libc is for C and not all programs are written in C nowadays. > > Where are you seeing SBCL compiling direct syscalls? In my testing, > SBCL self-hosts just fine under a kernel modified to disallow syscalls > from the text segment, whereas go is killed under such a kernel. Are > you sure you're not seeing SBCL compile calls to the libc syscall > wrappers?
-- Thomas de Grivel kmx.io
