Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote: > > Just so this now applies to all /etc/examples/ files' manpages > > "consistently". > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > clematis (0xA2C87EDB507B4C53) > > > > ok, so i see from those threads that i was against expanding FILES, but > happy for entries for the corresponding files. > > so i'm broadly against your diff. ingo seems to have more or less > completely updated our FILES. the only question is about whether we need > FILES section in dhcpd.conf and httpd.conf. > > i don;t understand your reference to 28 out of 41 files. i cannot see > where we added any expanded FILES entries. can you provide a summary of > these inconsistencies, please?
I've never been sure if examples needs to always be documented. And something about a hobgoblin.
