Martin Pieuchot <m...@openbsd.org> wrote: > On 26/12/20(Sat) 18:23, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > [...] > > NetBSD and Solaris both provide SIMPLEQ_* and STAILQ_*. I'm not sure > > removing one in favour of the other is helpful. > > It would be helpful to provide both set of macros for some time to ease > the transition/conversion. > > Then we can decide if we want to get rid of SIMPLEQ_* or not.
What is lacking in this converstation is the justification. Why? the word "unification" really means nothing, is there a reason for wanting to change this? Is it more debuggable? Is it more debuggable? What's the underlying reason for wanting go to one way or the other?
