On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 08:06:06PM +0200, Stefan Hagen wrote: > Peter J. Philipp wrote: > > > I have a Wacom Intuos. > > Which one?
It didn't say in the dmesg if I recall correctly, luckily I found the packaging. CTL-490 DW-S. > > I found that I could not write anything as good as with the pressure > > having a higher threshold ie. the original driver. > > Can you be more specific? Did you have false activations without > touching the tablet? I found it very hard to just write "This is a test" seemed harder to do with your patch. The lack of pressure on the pen caused it to miswrite. Maybe I'm just used to the pressure for the pad as it is. To make sure there was a difference I booted the laptop with the Pad back with the original code and did find it much easier writing. > The pressure sensor is used because the button activation is flaky. > See comment in the code. > > To verify this, I've taken out the pressure code and checked when button > 0 usually activates. This correlates with pressure 1. That was another > indicator that my patch would make the tablet behave more as it should. > > > I used gimp to write with the wacom which is the utility I use to draw > > when I do draw with the Intuos. > > I'm using xournal. I tried gimp as well. Works very well for me with the > patched setting. > > I can, however, understand that when you're used to having to push hard, > a lighter setting might feel off. > > Best Regards, > Stefan Hmm, well don't let me stop your patch, I just wanted to give feedback on how I perceived it. I'm not one to recommend quirks as I know the less of these the better, I don't know if there is a real difference between your CTL-490 and mine, on my packaging there is one other marking it says: CTL-490/W1-BX. Best Regards, -peter
