On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:56:54 +0200, Andreas Kusalananda =?utf-8?B?S8OkaMOkcmk=? = wrote:
> But note that this comes out of a discussion on how to do '0,/re/' > addressing with OpenBSD sed. Your changes appears to remove one way of > actually handling a match of '/re/' on the first line without giving us > another. It would be better to have a clean way of doing the equivalent > of '0,/re/' than to remove a way to do this. Interestingly (?), the sed > in plan9port works the same as our native sed. As does AT&T sed on Solaris. Since our sed currently matches the behavior of the "canonical" sed, I don't see a reason to change it. - todd
