On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 08:25 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:56:54 +0200, Andreas Kusalananda
> =?utf-8?B?S8OkaMOkcmk=?
> = wrote:
>
> > But note that this comes out of a discussion on how to do '0,/re/'
> > addressing with OpenBSD sed. Your changes appears to remove one way of
> > actually handling a match of '/re/' on the first line without giving us
> > another. It would be better to have a clean way of doing the equivalent
> > of '0,/re/' than to remove a way to do this. Interestingly (?), the sed
> > in plan9port works the same as our native sed.
>
> As does AT&T sed on Solaris. Since our sed currently matches the
> behavior of the "canonical" sed, I don't see a reason to change it.
>
> - todd
Ack. Like I said, just putting some feelers out. I'll drop the idea.
