On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:34:23AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Sol??ne Rapenne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree my sentence isn't good enough or is too much, but I think ZZZ > > explanations isn't enough in its current form > > Maybe it is lacking. But your previous diff didn't help anyone. > > > from your reply I got > > information such as external devices that wasn't described in the man > > page. > > External devices have to get detached. They lose their configuration > because they lose their power. > > The problem is that it is very difficult to explain to users, in a > precise way, what an 'external device' is versus an 'internal device'. > > It is extremely complicated, there is no way to accurately explain > in user-speak what devices detach and what devices don't detach. >
pluggable? > And if we can't write a correct sentence for that, maybe we should realize > we don't need to? > > Make a proposal. > i agree that the original proposal was wrong. if anything, you'd maybe want to know, for example, how to make it that you *were* asked for your password when resuming an encrypted mount. that seems more pertinent to softraid(4) than apm(8). jmc
