Hi there again, > […] > I don't believe there are any technical issues that warrant concern > on the part of the TB, but am happy to be part of the discussion if > you feel otherwise. From a CC perspective, again I don't believe > there are policy questions or concerns. We would have no issue if a > third party published a remix of this nature. It was a debate as to > whether the name should be "Canonical Business Desktop" or "Ubuntu > Business Desktop", we felt the awkwardness of differentiating this > from Ubuntu was very high - we do not want to be lumped in the same > category as "Fedora / RHEL" as it is a completely different > proposition from both Ubuntu and Canonical. There's no legal issue > w.r.t. the trademark, both because this is a remix (and within > guidelines for the use of the name) and because Canonical owns the > mark in the first place.
Allison kindly prodded me to raise this with the TB. I've added two questions to the agenda for the next meeting, whose answers I hope will help this to move forward. Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ [email protected] ] Debian Developer [ [email protected] ] Ubuntu Developer [ [email protected] ] PhD student [ [email protected] ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
