Hello David I totally agree with you. FM is horrible in comparison; that's UK broadcasting I'm talking about here. In other parts of the world, they have their stereo broadcasting on AM, which I'm not going to comment on as I've never heard it. But if you put DAB up against FM stereo, it's a case of a knock-out in the first round. FM can't hold a candle to DAB, even in terms of speech quality.
There was recently an experiment by the BBC, (they didn't publicise the information). But they broadcast a few football matches with a stereo signal so that you could hear what was happening in the crowd in stereo. I'm not a football fan; but even I, who was watching simultaneous pictures on TV, have to say that it made the game much more realistic and Gordon enjoyed the commentary immensely as a result. Lynne On 25 Nov 2011, at 20:24, David Griffith wrote: I have spoken to people who maintain and defend FM. I have to say that I am not at all in their camp. Purely personally I consider DAB to be far far superior to FM. Many of my radios have FM and DAB capacity and I would never listen to the FM version of a station, given the choice. FM is only used if there is no or a poor DAB signal. Until you hear the same station on FM and DAB and can switch between the two instantly to compare you do not really realize how superior and clearer the DAB signal is. ======================================= The Techno-Chat E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and worm-free To modify your subscription options, please visit for forum's dedicated web pages located at http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/techno-chat You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Techno-Chat group at either of the following websites: http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/techno-chat/index.html Or: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> you may also subscribe to this list via RSS. The feed is at: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml> ---------------------------------------
