It took a little time for the database to amend itself, Roger. But should be 
fixed by now.

 
========================================

My compliments and kindest regards
Gordon Smith:
<[email protected]>

Accessibility & Information Technology Support Specialist.
Mobile/SMS:
+44 (0)7907 823971

————————————————————



On 29 Jan 2017, at 21:08, Roger Firman <[email protected]> wrote:

X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- Start ASpam results ---------------
X-SpamDetect-Info: This message may be spam. This message BODY has been altered 
to show you the spam information
X-SpamDetect: *********: 9.0 sd=9.0 Close nspam=1 nok=0 1.00  
$0.99(X-LangGuess:English) 0.99(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.90(spf2_failed) 
0.90(X-SpamContent:clean) 0.85(X-Verify-SMTP present) $0.20(X-Phrase:clean) 
0.20(dnswl_low) 0.20(X-myrbl:Color=yellow)
X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- End ASpam results -----------------


X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- Start ASpam results ---------------
X-SpamDetect-Info: This message may be spam. This message BODY has been altered 
to show you the spam information
X-SpamDetect: *********: 9.0 sd=9.0 Close nspam=1 nok=0 1.00  
$0.99(X-LangGuess:English) 0.99(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.90(spf2_failed) 
0.90(X-SpamContent:clean) 0.85(X-Verify-SMTP present) $0.20(X-Phrase:clean) 
0.20(dnswl_low) 0.20(X-myrbl:Color=yellow)
X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- End ASpam results -----------------


Dear Gordon,
 
No, this seems not to have fixed the issue, however, thank you for trying to do 
so.
 
Best wishes,
 
Roger.
 
From: Roger Firman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 29 January 2017 21:05
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Techno-Chat]: More On Spam Behaviour
 
 
X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- Start ASpam results ---------------
X-SpamDetect-Info: This message may be spam. This message BODY has been altered 
to show you the spam information 
X-SpamDetect: *********: 9.0 sd=0 Close nspam=nok=1.00  
$0.99(X-LangGuess:English) $0.99(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.04(X-myrbl:Color=ite) 
0.90(spf2_failed) 0.90(X-SpamContent:clean) $0.85(X-Verify-SMTP present) 
$0.20(X-Phrase:clean) 0.20(dnswl_low)
X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- End ASpam results -----------------
 
Dear Gordon,
 
Many thanks for your message.
 
Perhaps this will provide an opportunity for you to see if your changes have 
done the trick.
 
Best wishes,
 
Roger.
 
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 29 January 2017 19:13
To: Techno-Chat ... Technology Enthusiasm! <[email protected]>
Subject: [Techno-Chat]: More On Spam Behaviour
 
Hello again everybody
 
I just make a quite major change to the way we process spam. I’m not 100% that 
this will resolve the issue, but I guess we’ll find out for sure when, for 
example, Dane or Roger or Aiane posts to the group next.
 
Again, I do take this seriously and am keen to fix it.
 
========================================
 
My compliments and kindest regards
Gordon Smith:
<[email protected]>
 
Accessibility & Information Technology Support Specialist.
Mobile/SMS:
+44 (0)7907 823971
 
————————————————————

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to