Dear Gordon, Thank you for sticking with this issue.
Best wishes, Roger. -----Original Message----- From: Gordon Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 14 February 2017 18:05 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Techno-Chat]: More On Spam Behaviour It took a little time for the database to amend itself, Roger. But should be fixed by now. ======================================== My compliments and kindest regards Gordon Smith: <[email protected]> Accessibility & Information Technology Support Specialist. Mobile/SMS: +44 (0)7907 823971 ———————————————————— On 29 Jan 2017, at 21:08, Roger Firman <[email protected]> wrote: X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- Start ASpam results --------------- X-SpamDetect-Info: This message may be spam. This message BODY has been altered to show you the spam information X-SpamDetect: *********: 9.0 sd=9.0 Close nspam=1 nok=0 1.00 $0.99(X-LangGuess:English) 0.99(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.90(spf2_failed) 0.90(X-SpamContent:clean) 0.85(X-Verify-SMTP present) $0.20(X-Phrase:clean) 0.20(dnswl_low) 0.20(X-myrbl:Color=yellow) X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- End ASpam results ----------------- X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- Start ASpam results --------------- X-SpamDetect-Info: This message may be spam. This message BODY has been altered to show you the spam information X-SpamDetect: *********: 9.0 sd=9.0 Close nspam=1 nok=0 1.00 $0.99(X-LangGuess:English) 0.99(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.90(spf2_failed) 0.90(X-SpamContent:clean) 0.85(X-Verify-SMTP present) $0.20(X-Phrase:clean) 0.20(dnswl_low) 0.20(X-myrbl:Color=yellow) X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- End ASpam results ----------------- Dear Gordon, No, this seems not to have fixed the issue, however, thank you for trying to do so. Best wishes, Roger. From: Roger Firman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 29 January 2017 21:05 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Techno-Chat]: More On Spam Behaviour X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- Start ASpam results --------------- X-SpamDetect-Info: This message may be spam. This message BODY has been altered to show you the spam information X-SpamDetect: *********: 9.0 sd=0 Close nspam=nok=1.00 $0.99(X-LangGuess:English) $0.99(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.04(X-myrbl:Color=ite) 0.90(spf2_failed) 0.90(X-SpamContent:clean) $0.85(X-Verify-SMTP present) $0.20(X-Phrase:clean) 0.20(dnswl_low) X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- End ASpam results ----------------- Dear Gordon, Many thanks for your message. Perhaps this will provide an opportunity for you to see if your changes have done the trick. Best wishes, Roger. From: Gordon Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 29 January 2017 19:13 To: Techno-Chat ... Technology Enthusiasm! <[email protected]> Subject: [Techno-Chat]: More On Spam Behaviour Hello again everybody I just make a quite major change to the way we process spam. I’m not 100% that this will resolve the issue, but I guess we’ll find out for sure when, for example, Dane or Roger or Aiane posts to the group next. Again, I do take this seriously and am keen to fix it. ======================================== My compliments and kindest regards Gordon Smith: <[email protected]> Accessibility & Information Technology Support Specialist. Mobile/SMS: +44 (0)7907 823971 ————————————————————
