I’m very happy to hear you’re enjoying the Soundlink III
Firstly - this is how I read it - it appears there may be some confusion 
between the Soundlink III and the Soundlink Mini.
The Soundlink III is the bigger of the two and has been with us for a few 
years, I bought one 3 years ago and was very happy with it until I heard 
something else but that’s another story which I’ve already related.
The Soundlink Mini I believe is into the Forth generation now.
The Soundlink Mini is a smaller Bluetooth speaker device and from memory I 
think its smaller slightly than the Jawbone Jambox but don’t hold me to that. I 
gave my Soundlink Mini away a few months ago and that version was the previous 
generation I bought at the same time as buying my Soundlink III.
Anyway, the new Soundlink Mini I’m told isn’t as powerful and I could well 
understand that given the newer version runs from a much lower voltage than the 
older version did, part of what I call the convenience and gimmick type 
functionality the new Mini offers - hands free speaker phone and Text to Speech 
- so I sincerely hope the audio quality of the latest Soundlink Mini wasn’t 
compromised by adding these features or opting to use a lower voltage to power 
the unit just to impress a few people who like to charge their devices via a 
USB port.
However what’s done is done, Bose have made their decisions, they have there 
reasons and there the story ends.
I’ve seen favourable reviews regarding the audio quality - much of that booming 
bass associated with Bose has gone in favour of a more pronounced mid-range and 
top - which may be very welcome news.
So back to the Bose Soundlink III itself and why did I rid myself of it? 
Because I found something that I believed sounded far better and that was the 
B&W T7.
If you listen to the T7 you’ll notice a dramatic change in the sound stage 
itself, you’ll find it easier to pick separate instruments than you can with 
the Bose, my experience anyway so you have a T7 I believe? Perhaps when time 
permits you can do some comparisons between that and the Soundlink III and - to 
get the maximum enjoyment - play some FLAC files from your Samsung Galaxy phone 
which supports the lossless aptX transfer the B&W T7 is compatible with.

> On 27 Feb 2017, at 11:55 pm, Gordon Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Good Monday to you one it all or, if you're one of those from down-under, 
> good Tuesday!
> 
> I've been doing some more testing with the Bose Soundlink and, first off, I 
> need to retract one of my comments from an earlier post. I stated that the 
> top end of the audio spectrum was a little dull on this device. I need to 
> retract that, because testing with otheh content has clearly disproved that 
> view.
> 
> In actual fact, when I listen to some acoustic guitar music, I'm left 
> speechless by how clearly the high-ej of the guitar's characteristics stand 
> out. Put plainly, The sound that I get from this particular Bluetooth speaker 
> system is nothing short of amazing! And that is just one superbative which 
> springs to mind, I can think of many many more of them, probably not good 
> enough to describe it!
> 
> I'm lead to believe that the Soundlink3 previous generation was more powerful 
> in specifications to this model. That may well be true, I really don't know. 
> All I do know if that if more power were needed, I really cannot for the life 
> of me understand why. After all, these devices are not designed to wake up 
> half the street! They're designed for personal listening and, to that end, 
> this generation of SoundLink3 serves more than adequately.
> 
> Some have stated that the SoundLink3 is over-powering as far as base content 
> goes. So why, then, would anybody turn around and, in the next breath, claim 
> that it is not powerful enough? Speaking personally, I enjoy a full rich 
> sound, full of base and also full of hi?-end audio. To the SoundLink3 serves 
> my purpose extremely well. whether the content be spoken word or music.
> 
> My next test, and I fubly expect the device to pass with flying colours, is 
> to listen to a piece of orchestral music containing strings and brass, as 
> thell as precussion and base drums and double-base. That will show up any 
> waknesses very well, if they exist.
> 
> I also have another similar device about which I shall speak in a future 
> post. But suffice it to say that I expect that this other device will have to 
> really go some to beat the new generation of SoundLink3.
> 
> More later.
> 
> ==============================
> 
> My Compliments And Kindest Regards
> Gordon Smith
> 'Accessibility And Information Technology Support Specialist
> ------------------------------

**********
Those of a positive and enquiring frame of mind will leave the rest of the 
halfwits in this world behind.



Reply via email to