Yes, I certainly appreciate the difference between an Android tablet, and a 
Galaxy Book. I’m not sure what you mean though about Android tablets. There are 
lots of very good tablets out there which are based on Android. Indeed, were it 
not for the fact that the PixelBook is so highly priced, I may very well have 
thought about an early Christmas present from Santa!

I presume, based on your comments, that you mean a convertible, such as the 
Galaxy Book, the Microsoft Surface Pro and other similar Windows machines which 
have support for both touch technologies and traditional keyboards.

In which case, again, there are quite a few options on the Android platform. I 
believe Toshiba, for example, market such a device. In fact, I would suspect 
that a Google search would turn up several examples.

Most machines can, in fact, probably beat the specs of the Galaxy Book and the 
Surface Pro in many regards. The resources required to support Android are a 
little less demanding than a Windows-based solution although to be utterly 
fair, that gap has closed significantly since Microsoft streamlined much of its 
coding for Windows 10.

It wasn’t very many years ago that I was quite oversee to the possibility that 
I may buy another Microsoft product, owing to the resource-hungriness and 
general poor stability of the operating system itself. That situation has, 
however, now been turned on its head. Finally, Microsoft has woken up to the 
fact that they were quite a way behind Unix/LINUX/BSD and, consequently, MacOS 
as well. But now, Windows 10 crashes are something which I for one encounter 
only extremely rarely and I think that Microsoft has done a fine job at 
cleaning up their act.

But back to the point. I think that now it’s very much down to consumer needs 
when it comes to buying tablets and other modern computers. Many people go for 
the convertible, and usually that means Windows. However, its quite encouraging 
to know that devices such as the Google PixelBook do exist. Maybe next year, I 
could just be interested if the device continues to receive the rave reviews 
that it’s getting at the moment.

========================================

My compliments and kindest regards
Gordon Smith:
<gor...@mac-access.net>
Accessibility & Information Technology Support Specialist..

This Message Was Created Using 100% Recycled Electrons. If you can avoid 
printing it, please do so. Think of the environment, save a tree!

  Contact:

• UK Free Phone:
0800 8620538
• UK Geographic / Global:
+44(0) 1642 688095
• UK Mobile/SMS:
+44 (0)7804 983849
• Vic. Australia:
+61 38 82059300
• US/Canada:
+1 646 9151493

----------------------------------------








On 14 Nov 2017, at 21:14, Dane Trethowan <grtd...@internode.on.net> wrote:

Firstly the Samsung Galaxy Books are Windows based tablets so if you purchase a 
Galaxy Book you're literally purchasing yourself a mini Windows 10 Pro machine, 
nothing wrong with that whatever.

I was asked what I thought the best Android tablet was.

Only my opinion of course but I don't think there's any best Android tablet 
right now and I'm astonished that I'm making such remarks as there very clearly 
should be some very good Android tables around but for some reason there isn't.

When it comes to build the iPad range are tops, I've not yet seen an Android 
tablet come even close.

When it comes to Power the iPad keeps moving ahead.

So we have the iPad but then that's not everything that people may demand from 
a tablet, yes its powerful but perhaps not versatile enough and that's where a 
good Android tablet should be in its element but no, not yet, the only 
alternative then is a Windows tablet such as the Galaxy Book.

The Galaxy Book isn't quite as well built as an iPad but its a tough build all 
the same as all modern Samsung phones and tablets seem to be thus should last 
you hears to come.

I'm working on a series of audio demos for the Samsung Galaxy Book 12 at the 
moment and will release them shortly.



On 11/15/2017 7:32 AM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> The latest model is called the PixelBook. The main advantage is that there is 
> now full 100% Android app support built-in which means, of course, that you 
> can install TalkBack and BrailleBack. Specs look quite good, although I still 
> think that the Samsung Galaxy Books, based on what I’ve read and what I’ve 
> been told, offer a better alternative.
> 
> ========================================
> 
> My compliments and kindest regards
> Gordon Smith:
> <gor...@mac-access.net <mailto:gor...@mac-access.net>>
> Accessibility & Information Technology Support Specialist..
> 
> This Message Was Created Using 100% Recycled Electrons. If you can avoid 
> printing it, please do so. Think of the environment, save a tree!
> 
>   Contact:
> 
> • UK Free Phone:
> 0800 8620538
> • UK Geographic / Global:
> +44(0) 1642 688095
> • UK Mobile/SMS:
> +44 (0)7804 983849
> • Vic. Australia:
> +61 38 82059300
> • US/Canada:
> +1 646 9151493
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10 Nov 2017, at 10:14, Joshua Gregory <joshtg...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:joshtg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I'll have to take a look at that, thank you!
> 
> On
> 
> Fri, Nov 10, 2017, 12:07 AM Dane Trethowan <grtd...@internode.on.net 
> <mailto:grtd...@internode.on.net>> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> No first hand experience hereas yet.
> 
> I've thought about getting a Chromebook to look at and I do know someone
> who uses a Chromebook fulltime, he's totally blind and loves it, he came
> from using an Apple Mac Mini and Voiceover.
> 
> Further to this, may I suggest you look up the AFB Access World magazine.
> 
> There you'll find a series of reviews and articles that have tracked the
> Chromebook and the Screen Reading technology.
> 
> On 11/10/2017 1:34 PM, Joshua Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I was wondering if anybody has had any experiences with Chromebooks
> > and the chromevox screen reader. What were your experiences? Did you
> > like it, did you not? Was there anything that stood out to you in
> > comparison to, say, windows and nvda or narrator? Thanks very much!
> >
> 
> --
> 
> **********
> "For the gardener nothing is more handier than bulbs, I mean the one's you 
> put in the ground and not the electric light one's."
> **********
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> This post, like all posts to the Techno Chat E-Mail group has been scanned by 
> our server-side antivirus/malware solution. This should not, however, be 
> viewed as a substitution for your own security strategy. We assume no 
> culpability whatever, implicit or otherwise, for any compromise to your 
> systems as a result of opening any post to this group. Suffice it to say that 
> we remain vigilant within the boundaries of reason. We strongly urge you to 
> do likewise! You have been warned!!!
> 
> You can find an RSS listing of all posts to this group at:
> <https://mail.mac-access.net:7025/list/techno-chat@techno-chat.net 
> <https://mail.mac-access.net:7025/list/techno-chat@techno-chat.net>>
> or at:
> <https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=all&q=techno-chat@techno-chat.net 
> <https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=all&q=techno-chat@techno-chat.net>>
> 
> To encourage your friends to join this group, first accept our thanks for 
> spreading the word. Then, have them send a message to the list processing 
> engine at:
> <techno-chat-j...@techno-chat.net <mailto:techno-chat-j...@techno-chat.net>>
> To toggle on/off Digest (batch) mode for this group, please send a blank 
> message to:
> <techno-chat-dig...@techno-chat.net 
> <mailto:techno-chat-dig...@techno-chat.net>>
> To leave the group, please send a blank message to:
> <techno-chat-le...@techno-chat.net 
> <mailto:techno-chat-le...@techno-chat.net>>.
> 
> To contact the support address for this group, please write to:
> supp...@techno-chat.net <mailto:supp...@techno-chat.net>>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> 

-- 

**********
"For the gardener nothing is more handier than bulbs, I mean the one's you put 
in the ground and not the electric light one's."
**********

Reply via email to