At 3:16 PM -0700 4/14/06, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
- Section 4.3 stateso Potential Req-EDITCHGSTATS-1 - The IETF technical publisher should provide monthly statistics on the types of editorial corrections being found during review as well as the percent of corrections which are rejected by the authors. This will require even more time spent on each document, as it will require stopping to make tally marks each time we mark a correction, or going through the document a second time to count and tally the marks inserted.
Not really. First, statistics could be collected on a representative sample of documents during the month, not every document. Second, the person tallying does not need to be the person correcting, and therefor there is no requirement of "stopping to make tally marks". Such tallying could be done by the management, not the workers, for example.
--Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
