is anyone familiar with these? i find it hard to believe that transportation planning agencies are 1) this progressive and 2) legally able to do this and 3) able to get the wireless carriers to cooperate without a regulatory stick forcing them to do it

seems one way to avoid the big brother issues would be to only track govt employees. not the best sample


-----


Posted on Sat, Oct. 15, 2005

GIF image



Your cell phone could be a new traffic control aid
Missouri completing deal to monitor thousands of phones to map traffic conditions across state
By David A. Lieb
Associated Press
JEFFERSON CITY, MO. - Driving to work, you notice the traffic beginning to slow. And because you have your cell phone on, the government senses the delay, too.

A congestion alert is issued, automatically updating electronic road signs and Web sites and dispatching text messages to mobile phones and auto dashboards.

In what would be the largest project of its kind, the Missouri Department of Transportation is completing a contract to monitor thousands of cell phones, using their movements to map real-time traffic conditions statewide on 5,500 miles of major roads.

It's just one of a number of initiatives to more intelligently manage traffic through wireless data collection.

Officials say there's no Big Brother agenda in the Missouri project. The data will remain anonymous, leaving no possibility to track specific people from their driveway to their destination.

But privacy advocates are uneasy.

``Even though its anonymous, it's still ominous,'' said Daniel Solove, a privacy law professor at George Washington University and author of The Digital Person. ``It troubles me, because it does show this movement toward using a technology to track people.''

Cell phone monitoring already is being used by transportation officials in Baltimore, though not yet to relay traffic conditions to the public. Similar projects are getting under way in Norfolk, Va., and on a stretch of Interstate 75 between Atlanta and Macon, Ga.

But the Missouri project is by far the most aggressive -- tracking wireless phones across the whole state, including rural areas with lower traffic counts, and for the explicit purpose of relaying the information to other travelers.

In fact, it would be the biggest system of its kind in the world, said Richard Mudge, a vice president at Delcan Corp., the Canadian company that won the Missouri bid.

The contract is expected to be completed within several weeks, and a cell phone monitoring system tested and implemented within six months after that.

Governments have had the ability to measure traffic volume and speeds for years. They can embed sensors in pavement, or mount scanners and cameras along the road. But those methods require the installation of equipment, which must be maintained, and can take only a snapshot of traffic at a particular spot.

In contrast, ``almost everyone has a cell phone, so you have a lot of potential data points, and you can track data almost anywhere on the whole (road) system,'' said Valerie Briggs, program manager for transportation operations at the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

Although most new cell phones come equipped with Global Positioning System capability that can pinpoint their locations, the tracking technology used for transportation agencies does not depend on that.

Instead, it takes the frequent signals that wireless phones send to towers and follows the movement of the phones from one tower to another. Then it overlays that data with highway maps to determine where the phones are and how fast they are moving. Lumping thousands of those signals together can indicate traffic flow.

A Delcan demonstration Web site developed for Baltimore uses various shades of green, yellow and red to show block by block whether vehicles are moving at or below the speed limit. As rush hour started on a recent work day, observers could watch as green turned to yellow and then red on roads heading out of downtown.

The Missouri and Maryland plans assume that the contractor will market more detailed information to the private sector -- automakers that offer onboard navigation systems, cell phone companies, shipping businesses or media that broadcast rush-hour traffic reports.

The private marketing helps drive down the states' cost. Missouri expects to spend less than $3 million a year on the service, Rahn said, although the exact price won't be known until the contract is completed.



---
You are currently subscribed to telecom-cities as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To 
unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manage your mail settings at 
http://forums.nyu.edu/cgi-bin/nyu.pl?enter=telecom-cities
RSS feed of list traffic: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/telecom-cities@forums.nyu.edu/maillist.xml

Reply via email to