Any luck merging that in?? Jesse
On Aug 26, 3:34 pm, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I could not find any time last night. Will start merging tonight and > hopefully > get everything done for you to try by the end of this weekend. The change is > pretty > big. > > Thanks for your patience, > > Jian > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sure, I will change the event handler to use syn.js and merge that in as > > soon as possible. > > > See if I can find some time tonight. > > > Thanks, > > > Jian > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> If you have a lot of fixes to it, I would like to give it a shot. > >> Our app is an extjs app so it is pretty heavy on javascript... If you > >> fixed 1/4 of the event firing issues that would help in a big way! > > >> Let me know when you get that merged. > > >> Thanks, > >> Jesse > > >> On Aug 25, 1:22 pm, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Yes, Tellurium Engine is still an experimental feature and we expected > >> > feedbacks > >> > from users so that we can improve it. But very few feedback so far, > >> which > >> > does not motivate > >> > us to go faster. But the new Engine is our focus and once the Test > >> Script > >> > runner, telluriumWorks, > >> > is in RC stage, we will go back to work on the Engine. If you are in > >> urgent > >> > need, I can merge > >> > the changes from Tellurium IDE back to the Engine project soon (this > >> week, > >> > to be more specific). > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Jian > > >> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > I guess I didn’t realize that it was an experimental feature. I don’t > >> > > think that was noted in the documentation. I am actually seeing a > >> > > several issues (runny any browser) related to event firing while using > >> > > the tellurium engine. Have you made any progress in the last few > >> > > weeks? If so, I would like to pull down your changes and give it a > >> > > shot. > > >> > > IE test coverage is pretty important for our project… Currently we are > >> > > not really getting any from using Tellurium. The grouping of UI > >> > > elements is pretty slick, but it makes the selectors too complex for > >> > > IE to handle quickly. It’s kind of a deal breaker for us if our > >> > > tests don’t run well in IE. > > >> > > It feels like you are headed toward a working solution with the > >> > > tellurium engine, but it isn’t quite ready for prime time yet. It > >> > > seems like your project has a wide umbrella of tasks/projects. Where > >> > > does tellurium engine development fall on your priority list? > > >> > > If you can let me know, it would be helpful. > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Jesse > > >> > > On Aug 12, 6:37 pm, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > Thanks, very interesting topic. > > >> > > > The Tellurium new APIs are still experimental and need more work. > >> The > >> > > speed > >> > > > improvement > >> > > > comes from three factors: > > >> > > > 1) Locate whole UI module, cache it, and re-use it later, which > >> saves > >> > > time > >> > > > for locating > >> > > > 2) Macro command to bundle multiple API calls into one call, which > >> saves > >> > > > time for round trip to Selenium server > >> > > > 3) jQuery selector as the default locator if not using UI module > >> cache. > > >> > > > Perhaps, you could try to use Macro command to reduce some round > >> trip > >> > > time > >> > > > and use cache to avoid > >> > > > re-locating. > > >> > > > Initially, we thought jQuery event trigger mechanism should work to > >> > > simulate > >> > > > user events, but if fact sometimes, they don't. > >> > > > We are going to a Javascript library called syn.js to improve that. > >> Hope > >> > > > that could solve many event fire issues > >> > > > in Tellurium new Engine. > > >> > > > For the second issue, the error is really caused by the fact that > >> the > >> > > Engine > >> > > > found two matches of your UI module > >> > > > in the runtime DOM. You could use the following command to see more > >> > > details: > > >> > > > validate(uid) > > >> > > > I am busy with Tellurium IDE, which include some improvement of the > >> new > >> > > > Engine. (You are welcome to try Tellurium IDE and it > >> > > > use Tellurium new Engine only to run tests, no more selenium code). > >> I > >> > > will > >> > > > merge the changes back to the new Engine project once I get the RC1 > >> > > release > >> > > > out. > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > Jian > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > I am trying to get our test running faster in IE… From looking at > >> your > >> > > > > documentation and forum posts, it appears that your recent release > >> > > > > addresses many of the performance problems. > > >> > > > > So… I decided to get with the times and upgraded from an old > >> 0.7.0- > >> > > > > SNAPSHOT (from December) to the 0.7.0 release. I am running into > >> a > >> > > > > few troubles with the new engine & API. > > >> > > > > Let me make sure I understand all these new settings. We now have > >> a > >> > > > > useCssSelectors method which will make sure I use css locators not > >> > > > > xpath locators in selenium. Not using xpath selectors should help > >> > > > > with IE slowness, but it is not quite a sliver bullet. > > >> > > > > Above and beyond that, we now have the useTelluriumApi method. > >> The > >> > > > > tellurium api is a reimplementation of selenium’s api. Most of > >> the > >> > > > > performance improvements come from using jquery to select elements > >> > > > > instead of selenium’s locators. > > >> > > > > There are a lot of options/settings, just wanted to make sure I > >> got it > >> > > > > right….. feel free to correct me! > > >> > > > > After the upgrade and playing around with the config options this > >> is > >> > > > > what I am running into: > > >> > > > > My test runs great with the selenium API but once I switch to the > >> > > > > Tellurium API… I run into a couple of problems. One is the > >> keyType > >> > > > > command. It does not seem to actually fire the keyDown, keyPress, > >> > > > > keyUp events in the browser. I can see the events in the logs… > >> but > >> > > > > the javascript events never fire in the app. (nice job on the > >> > > > > improved logging btw! Very helpful) > > >> > > > > I can wrap the the keyType like so: > >> > > > > useTelluriumApi(false) > >> > > > > keyType “locStr”, “text” > >> > > > > useTelluriumApi(true) > > >> > > > > The workaround gets the events to fire, but that causes IE to run > >> > > > > really slow again.. > > >> > > > > here are my logs, you can see the clock times are pretty bad. > >> > > > > TE: Name: useTeApi, start: 1281642600893, duration: 31ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: useTeApi, start: 1281642600893, duration: 31ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: mouseOver, start: 1281642600940, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: mouseOver, start: 1281642600940, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: fireEvent, start: 1281642609367, duration: 8412ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: fireEvent, start: 1281642609367, duration: 8412ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642617779, duration: 8333ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642617779, duration: 8333ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642626112, duration: 8318ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642626112, duration: 8318ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642634430, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642634430, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642642888, duration: 8381ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642642888, duration: 8381ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642651269, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642651269, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642659696, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642659696, duration: 8427ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642668139, duration: 8349ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642668139, duration: 8349ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642676488, duration: 8412ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642676488, duration: 8412ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642684900, duration: 8364ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642684900, duration: 8364ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642693280, duration: 8412ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642693280, duration: 8412ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642701692, duration: 8333ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyPress, start: 1281642701692, duration: 8333ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642710025, duration: 8396ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyUp, start: 1281642710025, duration: 8396ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: mouseOut, start: 1281642718437, duration: 8474ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: mouseOut, start: 1281642718437, duration: 8474ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: fireEvent, start: 1281642726927, duration: 8380ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: fireEvent, start: 1281642726927, duration: 8380ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: useTeApi, start: 1281642735307, duration: 31ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: useTeApi, start: 1281642735307, duration: 31msTE: Name: > >> > > > > keyDown, start: 1281642668139, duration: 8349ms > >> > > > > TE: Name: keyDown, start: 1281642668139, duration: 8349ms > > >> > > > > Issue #2 > >> > > > > I am also having an issue if I use useCache(true) option. It > >> looked > >> > > > > like a cool new toy as well so I thought I would try it out! I > >> get > >> > > > > the following error when I try that: > > >> > > > > com.thoughtworks.selenium.SeleniumException: ERROR: Found 2 > >> matches > >> > > > > for UI module loginPage > >> > > > > at > > >> com.thoughtworks.selenium.HttpCommandProcessor.throwAssertionFailureExcepti > >> > > onOrError(HttpCommandProcessor.java: > >> > > > > 97) > >> > > > > at > > >> > > > > I did only define one UI module with id loginPage... > > >> > > > > Do you have any words of wisdom on either of these two issues?? > >> > > > > If you have any other > > ... > > read more » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tellurium-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
