Functionally this is not split mode, it's an omnidirectional array.

Do omni's cause issues? We have a bunch of omni sites, so if we're already hurting ourselves that would be good to know....I mean hurting ourselves in ways other than the obvious problems intrinsic to omnis.


------ Original Message ------
From: "David Peterson" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 6/17/2016 1:04:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Telrad] splitters

Well the main issue is that in order to do the current split there was a lot of coding to make sure that the RF didn’t cause any issues. The setup you describe would likely break any of the internal algorithms and run pretty horribly.



David



From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 12:01 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: [Telrad] splitters



We know we can put two sector antennas back to back. What if we had 4 90 degree sectors in an array and used a set of hybrid splitter/combiners to connect all 4 antennas to one compact?



Omni coverage without farting around with omnis. To expand capacity you remove splitters and put in a second BTS.



You would lose 3db from splitting, and probably another db to insertion loss and extra cable, but you can make that up on the Tx side by turning up the Tx power. You'd be a little weaker on the Rx at the BTS and you couldn't fix that, but download is more important than upload so maybe I don't have to care.



Is this a bad idea for any other reasons?


_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

Reply via email to