Hey Jeremy, We are seeing the same issue here. I talked to David @ Telrad about setting up the handover. He said it was not currently setup to work the way we would want and would more then likely cause UE's to ping/pong back and forth between eNBs.
I have not tried it, but I would think that if handover was set to move UE's with CINR <=5 then it would force those UE's to move to a better eNB. That might leave some UE's with CINR of 6-10 that would need to move but would not. If the handover threshold works up to ~15 CINR (just to try to get all of them) then UE's might ping/pong back and forth between eNB's. You might end up with a hand full of UE's that need to move but don't hit the handover threshold. Need more details from Telrad on how that works -- all assumptions on my part. Matt Carpenter On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Jeremy Austin <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone had any success with roaming in release 6.6? I'm seeing a > situation on a 360° site where if we take one ENB down (say, a config > change), UEs on the edge can easily associate with the "wrong" ENB. > > The UEs stay on the wrong ENB even when the stronger signal comes back > online. We aren't currently using frequency lock. > > Theoretically the handover thresholds can be manipulated (RSRP) to allow > the UEs to migrate back to the "right" ENB, once it comes back online, > correct? > > Or is the only working approach right now to lock each UE to a specific > frequency? > > Thanks > > -- > Jeremy Austin > > (907) 895-2311 > (907) 803-5422 > [email protected] > > Heritage NetWorks > Whitestone Power & Communications > Vertical Broadband, LLC > > Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > -- *Matthew Carpenter* *806-316-5071 office* *806-236-9558 cell*
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
