This is an element of scale, we have 23 eNodeB's and over 500 UE's. Terry
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Carpenter Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Telrad] Down tilt - UE drops We have 4 eNB’s deployed, 106 UE’s and its working good. I had a UE that needed a reboot this morning (7000 on Beta firmware), but other then that our service calls for LTE service issues are far and few between. The Telrad LTE product has had a few bumps in the road, but all have been taken care of and things are running very smooth. No dropped UE’s, or other odd things I hear about. It has saved us in a an area where 5ghz went from working great to crap overnight. Matt Carpenter Amarillo Wireless > On Sep 21, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Paul Vaughn <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was looking at this issue yesterday and found a major drop in utilization > (from 70% to 20%) and 6 dropped UEs on the BV graphs at the same time. I > would normally think that a customer turned their unit off, or when 5 or 6 > cut off at the same time, I would think there was a power outage. But, it > appears that the customers were actively using the service and then > disconnected. Customers have been complaining, but it has not been something > we were able to see easily. We are the only licensed provider in this > region. I know the owner of the other license in the next market and it is > not deployed. So the interference is very un-likely to be the cause here. > > We are also deploying 450i sectors - putting a new tower up today actually. > It rocks. No dropped UEs, manages interference like a boss - 900 MHz even, > and a fraction of the cost. It is hard to justify paying more for more > troubles and less satisfied customers. We put a lot of hope in Telrad > initially, and then the new firmware recently, and neither seem to be > delivering. I am going to try to roll back the UE firmware as recommended on > here and see if that helps. > > Paul > > > Paul R. Vaughn > Tennessee Wireless > (931) 996-2050 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Telrad Digest, Vol 23, Issue 25 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:48:29 -0400 > From: Neil Smellie <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Telrad] Down tilt > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <CA+mJW-A2NHQ6GuL38sGB4E2kAQ_M2g=cl0smtxc2ew3son3...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > We are experiencing similar issues with the Compact 3000 in 2.3Ghz. > Customer complaints are sometimes fast, sometimes slow, long periods of no > service, UE just drops and requires the customer to repower the radio to > reconnect. I know Silo is using the same gear and seeing ducting from the > states in 2355MHz, but we are seeing issues in both 2355 and 2310. I am > having a hard time accepting the interference argument unless we are creating > some self interference. > > The LTE service was to be a flagship service for us. We now have > customers that we have moved fro Canopy FSK to LTE asking to be moved > back because they are not willing to trade speed to stability. We are > looking at moving some planned LTE deployments to the 450i 900Mhz > platform > > Neil Smellie > Core Broadband Inc > Interactive North > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Terry Duchcherer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, we have not had success with 105, UE continually disconnect and >> do not come back for long periods of time. We have also experienced >> many customer complaints about speed issues. >> >> >> >> Rolling back to .89 solves the speed issues, and greatly improves the >> disconnects. Telrad blames interference, which may be some of the >> cause, but not all of it. >> >> >> >> Terry >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> *On Behalf Of *Ian Fraser >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 9:36 AM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] Down tilt >> >> >> >> Thanks Terry >> >> I am running F1F2. So leave the eNB at 6.6 and move the UE's to .89 ? >> >> Thanks, >> Ian >> >> On 20/09/2016 11:30 AM, Adam Brodel wrote: >> >> Why back to .89? Are there problems with .105? >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] >> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Terry Duchcherer >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:40 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] Down tilt >> >> >> >> Ian, if you are running version 105 on the UE?s, try downgrading to .89. >> Also, with the sectors not back to back using F1F2 would be better. >> >> >> >> Terry >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] >> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Ian Fraser >> *Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2016 8:00 PM >> *To:* Jeremy Austin <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] Down tilt >> >> >> >> There are only 12 UE on that eNB. Average plan is 1x5. CINRS are all >> pretty good. I can lock them to the sector freq based on >> geographical location but thats a pain if I need to change channels. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Jeremy Austin <[email protected]> >> Date:09-19-2016 7:59 PM (GMT-05:00) >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [Telrad] Down tilt >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Now I see in BV that UpLink utilization is higher than it has ever been >> at 91% (peak was ~75% previously) vs. DL at 58%. I expect UL to drop >> or at least stay the same since we mitigated the noise slightly. >> >> I stopped frequency locking the UE's - could the UL utilization be >> caused by UE's that are on the 'wrong' sector ? >> >> >> How many UEs are on your ENB that's seeing high up utilization? >> >> >> >> We're currently wrangling with high upload (96% and more) usage on at >> least one sector in the low 20s. CINR are fairly high across the board. >> Seems to be new since 6.6, and doesn't seem to make much difference >> whether we're in 2x4 or 4x4 mode. >> >> >> >> We've been comparing the output of "show ue-info active-ue-info-list >> bearer-information" >> to identify UEs on the wrong sector. However, we're not using split >> mode, so I doubt that would be helpful for you ? from what I recall, >> split mode just splits the RF chains, not the overall LTE capacity, >> so a client has no way to identify which sector it's on. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jeremy Austin >> >> >> >> (907) 895-2311 >> >> (907) 803-5422 >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> Heritage NetWorks >> >> Whitestone Power & Communications >> >> Vertical Broadband, LLC >> >> >> >> Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Telrad mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >> >> > > > -- > Neil Smellie > Core Broadband Inc. > Interactive North > 27 Dominion Street > Bracebridge ON P1L 2A6 > 705-224-2673 ext 102 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was > scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/private/telrad/attachments/20160920/364 > 5497f/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > > End of Telrad Digest, Vol 23, Issue 25 > ************************************** > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad _______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad _______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
