Yes, I would like to see CINR and SINR (gave me a good idea of noise), and split them out. We could have it 2 degrees off and think its great, so I would like to see both chains again. On the 7K there were a few UE's with chains that were 4 -5 db off and no matter what I did would not align. I want to see that again since it gives a great clue to performance.
Matt Carpenter On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Nathan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Haha, my ticket included the same (?) 2 issues (radio name gets reset > after reboot, and TR-069 issues; specifically, TR-069 creq port is passed > through instead of intercepted when DMZ enabled). Also, yes, iperf needs > some work. > > > > Our first CPE8K install resulted in one of the best observed SINRs on the > network. We did a double-take when we saw it. RF performance really does > seem to be notably improved. Unfortuantely, we don't get CINR (though both > should be pretty close to each other), and we only see the 2 chains SINRs > combined into one value, which isn't optimal. > > > > -- Nathan > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Matthew Carpenter > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 08, 2016 10:01 PM > *To:* Telrad List > *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] CPE8000 impressions? > > > > We have 13 of the CPE8000's deployed. > > Working great! > > Have a ticket in also for some TR-069 issues, and the Radio name not > surviving a reboot. > > > > I do know that one of my installers that has been using at CPE7000 with > only a 13-14CINR now get a 19-20SINR and says its MUCH better! > > At first I thought he was not doing a good job aligning the CPE7000, but > this is not the first case of better CINR. In my testing I saw around a 2 > CINR better (radio/hand out the truck method of testing), but now that we > have swapped out a few CPE7000's the numbers a much better then 2 CINR. > > > > iPerf testing need to be fixed (ticket in for that). I believe there is a > new Firmware version that fixes many of these issues that about ready to > come out. > > > > Matt Carpenter > > Amarillo Wireless > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Bryce Duchcherer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We have a couple deployed, I am looking forward to future software > revisions. I like the UI way better than the 7000 and it is allot more > responsive and has more detail. > We don't have enough deployed to tell performance yet. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Nathan Anderson > Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Telrad] CPE8000 impressions? > > Of those that have gotten some and have tried them out, what are your > impressions so far? > > I just opened a ticket outlining some firmware problems we have run into > (mostly management related stuff), but other than that my impression at > this point is pretty darn positive. RF performance seems to be on point so > far, and I'm really digging the web interface on this thing: it is so much > more "lightweight", more responsive, and less visually busy. > > How have others faired? > > -- Nathan > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > > > > > -- > > *Matthew Carpenter* > > *806-316-5071 <806-316-5071> office* > > *806-236-9558 <806-236-9558> cell* > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > -- *Matthew Carpenter* *806-316-5071 office* *806-236-9558 cell*
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
