On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 17:45, Mark Fowler wrote: > On 30 Oct 2002, Simon Wilcox wrote: > > > Template Toolkit 2.08 fails to build on my new Redhat 8.0 box with perl > > 5.8.0 > > Funny, it built fine on my new Debian Sid box with perl 5.8.0. ;-)
[% INCLUDE std.flamewar.linux.distribution %] :) > > t/autoform.t fails but this seems to be a known, and unresolved, problem > > with Text::Autoformat [ http://makeashorterlink.com/?C3C252942 ] > > Right, so there is or isn't a problem with TT? Did Text::Autoformat build > and pass tests on your system? I haven't got Text::Autoformat installed > on my system at all. Send us the details of the problem, we should shove > it in the FAQ or INSTALL guide if nothing else. Sorry, I wasn't clear. Text::Autoformat has similar errors. I suspect it is something different in the underlying sprintf function. No idea how to go about figuring out what versions of the C libraries I have though. According to the redhat website, I should have glibc 2.2.93 on the machine. Is that where sprintf lives ? It also uses gcc 3.2 > Okay, that passes on my machine. Must be something up with your machine > then, or a module problem... Can you send the version of HTML::Entities > you have installed? I have version 1.23 installed. 1.23 here too. > > I don't think either of these are fatal so I will just force an install > > but it probably needs fixing. > > When it comes down to it is this actually an error or an erroneous test? > I think in this circumstance either is an acceptable output. Patching the > test suite so it can match either isn't trivial, but I can have a go if > that's what we think it is... This is an erroneous test I think. The encoding is valid, it just uses numbers instead of the helper names. Simon. _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
