> I'm attaching a new test file you can run along with a file of
> benchmarks.
It was a good idea to benchmark the sub. At least it is obvious
now, that replacement without backreferences should be handles
separately, the simplest way. I ran the benchmark on my windows
pc, and get similar (even more contrast) results.
Totals:
Rate replace_andy
replace_andy 13224/s --
replace_andy_with_patch 20224/s 53%
replace_josh_new2 27434/s 107%
I don't think using no strict 'refs' is a big trouble (at least it
is used quite often in so many modules), so IMO josh_new2 may be a
good candidate.
--
Sergey Martynoff
_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
