Sean McAfee wrote:
On 3/15/07, *Johan Vromans* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:"Sean McAfee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes: > I guess I'm about ready to put a lot more eyes on it, if there's any > interest. So, is there?I'm not a Python user so I may not be your target audience, but I think it is a very good thing to have alternative implementations for the TT language (note that I use 'language'; this is slightly different from the TT processor). But PLEASE stay in sync with the TT specs. I'm willing to put in the effort to do so, at least for the near term. So, um... Anyone else?
As long as it follows specs along with changes to the specs, it is increasing adoption and portability of TT. That seems like a good thing to me. Can't say I'm interested in the Python version for actual use currently, though. -- Josh _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
