Darren Chamberlain wrote:
On 4/10/07, Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I may help out a little bit. I would probably use it. I like TT2 and
maintain the Debian package but am doing most of my work in Python these
days.
If this is going to happen, we should bug Andy about getting it into
the canonical SVN repository.
Also, as I mentioned previously, I'm concerned about keeping
consistency between the Perl version and other versions, and getting
the tests shared between implementations will go a long way toward
this. Currently, the tests all use Template::Test, which reads test
templates, data, and expected results out of the __DATA__ section of
each .t file. I'd like to see these same test files used by the
Python implementation, although I don't know how we could do that just
yet.
On a similar vein - I am currently writing/toying with writing TT in
(Server-side) javascript for zimki - and I also plan to use the same set
of tests. The problem lies in the different config options that some
tests (can?) have, and how to get this. I suspect things might be easier
if the config and tests were moved into some easier format to parse.
Oh and on the subject of tests, how about using Test::More or something
similar? Pleeease?
Cheers
Ash
_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
