http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4015


Aubrey.Li <aubreylee at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aubreylee at gmail.com




--- Comment #6 from Aubrey.Li <aubreylee at gmail.com>  2008-10-21 23:25:24 ---
>Yes. I think we want to try and avoid dispatching threads to idle domains that
>are sleeping deeply, and instead utilize a "shallower" idle domain, or one
>that's not idle at all. I would worry that there would be issues with
>re-leveling the hierarchy in this way (no sorting by # of CPUs). I had instead
>thought of explicitly looking at the "idle depth" when searchign for an idle
>CPU in a candidate PG group when forced to grow utilization to other domains...

I think it probably can be implemented passively? currently cmt pg's capacity
is
defined to be the number of active logical CPUs in the group. I think this
number 
is too small to help much for deep idle. Increasing the capacity automatically 
group the utilization on one idle domain and help CPUs in another domain sleep 
deeper.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to