Rafael Vanoni wrote: > Li, Aubrey wrote: >> Rafael.Vanoni wrote: >> >>> Hey everyone >>> >>> This is the same patch I posted here last time, but without the -i >>> option, as I'm still working on that. This one allows non-priv users >>> to use the tool (if they have dtrace privileges) and some more >>> code cleanup. >>> >>> Thought it would be best to get these changes out of the way >>> and have a >>> cleaner patch once I fix the -i option. Hope you agree. >>> >>> thanks >>> Rafael >> >> Yeah, this one looks good, please feel free to commit into repo. >> >> Since I can't commit code directly into any tesla repo any more, >> the battery patch I submitted is also based on rev5931, which >> would fail to import after you commit your "non-priv user" patch. >> You might take care of it or just let me know I have to re-submit >> the patch against your 5932. > > Hi Aubrey > > I imported your patch on top of my repo (which contained my 5932) and > it worked fine :) > > $ hg tip > changeset: 5933:0a4a60b78db5 > tag: tip > user: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li at intel.com> > date: Mon Apr 21 02:09:18 2008 +0800 > summary: add battery consumption information > > I'll push my changes and then yours, if that's alright with you.
That would be great, thanks. > How come you can't commit code to tesla anymore ? > There is a story about the code license between Sun and Intel. Although it doesn't make any sense of open source project, I have to defer to it. Thanks, -Aubrey
