Mark.Haywood at Sun.COM wrote: > Mark Haywood wrote: >> Li, Aubrey wrote: >>> Mark.Haywood at Sun.COM wrote: >>> >>>> Li, Aubrey wrote: >>>>> Alexander Kolbasov wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Attached is the version that prints >>>>>> >>>>>> Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 12/05/2007 12:01:46 >>>>>> on-line since 11/26/2007 15:06:47. >>>>>> The i386 processor operates at [1596, 2128, 2660] 2660 MHz, >>>>>> and has an i387 compatible floating point processor. >>>>>> ... >>>>> This one looks good to me. >>>> I should point out that I've seen at least one platform (MacBook >>>> Pro I think) that exported about 10 P-states. >>> So are you suggesting we should display a range like [1596 MHz - >>> 2660 MHz]? >> >> I do feel strongly about either format, but thought others might if >> they knew it was possible (but probably rare) to see 10 frequencies >> listed. > For some users don't know speedstep, a range like [1596 MHz - 2660 Mhz] will let them think the processor can change the speed smoothly. If the range display is prefered, I suggest to give the number of how many steps out.
> Make that, "I do not ..." So, what's your thoughts? Keep the current one? But I think Alex's idea is good, ;-) -Aubrey
