Alexander Kolbasov wrote: >> Mark Haywood wrote: >> >>> If I thought it was common to see more than 4-5 P-states I'd prefer the >>> range. My minimal experience has been that more than 4 is uncommon. So, >>> if I absolutely had to give an opinion? Yeah, I think that the separate >>> list of frequencies is better. >>> >>> >> What if psrinfo(1M) went with the range if the number of frequencies (or >> the string length) exceeded some threshold? >> > > It is a possibility, although it is a bit odd to change the semantics based > on > the length of the output string. Let's play with the current version and get > a > feeling of how useful is it. > > BTW, what do we do with it? Should I integrate it in some of your PM > repositories or it is ok living as a flying dutchman in mailing lists? > I was thinking it would be nice to have in the cpupm-gate as a nice thing to have while things are being developed. Mark, what do you think? We can also make it available via a link on the front project page. Since it's just a perl script, it's easy to install :)
Thanks, -Eric
