Li, Aubrey wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I encountered a problem today and found cpu pm infrastucture in > cpupm-gate > is not usable when p-state is not supported while c-state is supported. > I also noticed this issue may be fixed in the T-state patch. > Just wonder, do you have plan to replace the infrastucture in cpupm-gate > by the > current one in T-state patch? >
Yes, I noticed that when you added the c-state support to cpupm-gate that if the P-states failed, C-states would not work as the driver would fail to load. I made sure to fix this in the T-state work Anup and I did. Yes, I do plan on replacing the cpupm-gate infrastructure. I'd prefer to wait until we actually integrate the T-state work (should be in the next couple of weeks). Can you workaround this issues for now? Or would you prefer that I look into replacing the infrastructure now? Thanks, Mark > Thanks, > -Aubrey >
