Mark Haywood <> wrote: > Li, Aubrey wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I encountered a problem today and found cpu pm infrastucture in >> cpupm-gate >> is not usable when p-state is not supported while c-state is supported. >> I also noticed this issue may be fixed in the T-state patch. >> Just wonder, do you have plan to replace the infrastucture in cpupm-gate >> by the >> current one in T-state patch? >> > > Yes, I noticed that when you added the c-state support to cpupm-gate > that if the P-states failed, C-states would not work as the driver would > fail to load. I made sure to fix this in the T-state work Anup and I did. > > Yes, I do plan on replacing the cpupm-gate infrastructure. I'd prefer to > wait until we actually integrate the T-state work (should be in the next > couple of weeks). Can you workaround this issues for now? Or would you > prefer that I look into replacing the infrastructure now? > I can workaround this issue now. waiting until t-state work integrated is okay for me.
Thanks, -Aubrey
