On 14 July 2010 19:54, rogerdpack <[email protected]> wrote: > In case these aren't commonly known, tesseract frequently seg faults > when passed bad data. If it's worth caring about... > > http://myfavoritepal.com/incoming/images/picture10.tif > http://myfavoritepal.com/incoming/images/picture10.pnm > > (for me on windows both cause seg faults, though of no panic). > Thanks much.
We had a mail in the last day or so about a segfault on Linux. I've been mulling over the idea of putting together a maintenance release of Tesseract 2, with memory fixes backported from Tesseract 3; this, and the fact that it's not clear when a proper release of 3 will be possible, makes me think it's worth doing... I only have to figure out how to cram an extra hour into a day, and I can do it :) -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en.
