Dmitri - thanks for your words , but still i am not getting what would help me to resolve this all, I can try it multi thread but it could be cross threading between various threads as multiple user can run with same instance and machine ..
indeed, i have installed 32 bit tesseract setup . please assist me if 64 bit of tess 3.2 setup can help me for this issue... i dont find 64 bit tess setup anywhere.. thank you. On Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:31:44 PM UTC+5:30, Dmitri Silaev wrote: > > Niral, > > IMO the bitness is not the reason here. You are striving to optimize > the running time for a single image but using different types of > processors. > > Tesseract at this time does not take advantage of multi-processor or > multi-core architecture. A single instance of Tesseract-enabled app > would run on a single core, hence all that matters is the clock, > memory and FSB speed, cache etc. Unless you make your own efforts to > write a multi-threaded Tesseract API based app, chopping an input > image to pieces and processing them in parallel. However special care > and manual changes to Tesseract code are required to make it > thread-safe. > > On the other hand, if you plan to use Tesseract in a high load > production environment, another approach is to rely on the host OS > task scheduler and run multiple instances of Tesseract (or your > Tesseract-enabled app) in parallel. Then the benefits of a multi-core > environment may become more evident. The task scheduler would balance > the load between the cores and overall system's processing speed would > be better. > > If the CPU speeds of your boxes are too close, then the reason might > be in a suboptimal hardware configuration, or maybe a cluttered > software environment. > > To configure your system's hardware, you'll need a clean machine (or > many of diverse types) and quite a few experiments to understand CPU > and memory consumption for your types of images. > > Warm regards, > Dmitri Silaev > www.CustomOCR.com > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Niral Prajapati > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I am using Tesseract3.0 for searchable pdf after creating hocr format > files > > , it takes 2-3 seconds for single image ( System configuration : Windows > > 64bit Os, Intel i5-2500 CPU @3.30 GHZ , 8GB RAM ). > > > > This is quite acceptable time for me, > > > > but it takes 20-23 seconds for single image (System configuration: > Windows > > Server 2003 -32bit, Intel Quad CPU , 8GB RAM ) > > > > which is totaly unacceptable , > > > > can anyone advise me to reduce this time ??... > > Thanks in advance > > > > -- > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]<javascript:> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en > > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "tesseract-ocr" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
