On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:36 AM, viraf <[email protected]> wrote:
> I created a large (1800 page) multi-page tiff and am feeding it to > Tesseract via command line (on Ubuntu). This way I am testing Tesseract > performance. > Is that representative of the documents that you work with? The multi-page TIFF buffering in Tesseract is messed up. I just created this issue to describe the problem: https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/issues/233 > This is about 25% the performance of a commercial engine that I am > evaluating (it gets about 24 PPM with 2 cores on my laptop), > What's the price/performance ratio? :-) Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/CAE9vqEHoXGVpJ7RkZffEs-MZpD0Sgkek2JTuF%3DuOMdEyzg151g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
