Tom, I created a multi-page TIFF as per earlier recommendation on this thread (avoid multiple inits). Running it on Linux from the command line provided me with a reference by which to compute PPM that I could target with Tess4J. I had hoped to get 10+ PPM / core and shift focus on accuracy. I am at about 6 PPM and unclear where / how to improve performance (speed).
- viraf On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 12:45:04 PM UTC-5, Tom Morris wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:36 AM, viraf <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I created a large (1800 page) multi-page tiff and am feeding it to >> Tesseract via command line (on Ubuntu). This way I am testing Tesseract >> performance. >> > > Is that representative of the documents that you work with? The multi-page > TIFF buffering in Tesseract is messed up. I just created this issue to > describe the problem: > https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/issues/233 > > >> This is about 25% the performance of a commercial engine that I am >> evaluating (it gets about 24 PPM with 2 cores on my laptop), >> > > What's the price/performance ratio? :-) > > Tom > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/4af7ea59-daa2-410a-b367-f7209d253160%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
