Thank you both. Im engaging people from the community to get things going. On 25 September 2017 21:34:56 EEST, Arthur Reutenauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stojan, > > To stress the central part of Mojca’s longish message, it would really >be best if you could get some people to work on the patterns and come >up >with a file that is definitely better than the current one, so that we >can simply replace the current file. Contrary to her, I do believe >it’s >entirely possible for patterns of unoptimal quality to be in use for >decades without anyone reporting it -- unfortunately it’s very hard for >us to get people to give us real feedback. I do in any case remember >seeing some weird things in the Bulgarian patterns. > > In any case, if you do come up with a new set of patterns, we >recommend the MIT licence (https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT). It’s >a >very simple licence, and -- as any free software licence -- it allows >the authors to formally retain the copyright. If you use someone >else’s >file, the conditions they put on them it apply, of course. > > Best, > > Arthur
-- С.
