>> Please elaborate.
>
> I think the patterns of the form 1nV and 1rV, for V any vowel, are
> useless because all the breaks they specify are already covered by
> the V1n and V1r patterns, and that all the 1gV could be replaced by
> just
>
> n1g
> n2g.
>
> i. e., break between any “ng” in the middle of a word.
Hmm. I haven't generated those patterns manually. What you see is
the direct result of patgen – who am I to modify this? :-) To be
serious: If patgen produces those patterns, I think they are *really*
necessary.
Werner
