Alexander V. Voinov wrote > Don Simons wrote: > > I still haven't had any volunteers to make up-to-date > > unix/linux versions. I > > won't be picky about which version (2.4 vs 2.402) but it should > > include the > > docs, example files, and pmx.tex. I did fix the EOL character in > > pmx240.for. > > What do you mean to volunteer? I always recompiled your .for on Unix > and > put .tex somewhere. If you mean rpm, this applies only to Linux, > although some geeks use it on othere systems as well.
Well, I'm not a regular unix or linux user. I do have linux available and use it once in a while. The few times I've used them, installing with rpm's seem to be slightly easier than running a FORTRAN compiler. As for making tar.gz's, I guess some people like to have a makefile, although I'm not sure what the advantages are. (I know the two are necessarily linked, but they are both part of linux-speak). Bottom line is, I use Windows. If no one who uses unix or linux feels any requirement to have rpm's or tar.gz's, then let's just drop it. --Don Simons _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
