On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 10:22:47PM -0700, Don Simons wrote: > Alexander V. Voinov wrote > > > Don Simons wrote: > > > > > I still haven't had any volunteers to make > > > up-to-date unix/linux versions. I won't be picky > > > about which version (2.4 vs 2.402) but it should > > > include the docs, example files, and pmx.tex. I did > > > fix the EOL character in pmx240.for. > > > > What do you mean to volunteer? I always recompiled > > your .for on Unix and put .tex somewhere. If you mean > > rpm, this applies only to Linux, although some geeks > > use it on othere systems as well. > > Well, I'm not a regular unix or linux user. I do have > linux available and use it once in a while. The few > times I've used them, installing with rpm's seem to be > slightly easier than running a FORTRAN compiler. As > for making tar.gz's, I guess some people like to have > a makefile, although I'm not sure what the advantages > are. (I know the two are necessarily linked, but they > are both part of linux-speak). Bottom line is, I use > Windows. If no one who uses unix or linux feels any > requirement to have rpm's or tar.gz's, then let's just > drop it. > > --Don Simons >
I maintain the doc section (which includes TeX and friends), for a Linux distro, it make my job easier if there is a tar.gz available of a package, so if no one else is willing I'll have a go at making a tarball of PMX Cheers Joel -- Sourcemage GNU/Linux /~\ ASCII Ribbon campaign Linux so advanced it may as well be magic \_/ stop HTML mail and news x11 & doc section maintainer / \ http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x47856819
msg01396/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
