Thank you very much, Olivier and Don
i used this line:
r8x3 c s1 e [u-2+4 ax3nf3-2 \tbu2\ c s1 \def\tbu#1{\relax}\def\qb#1#2{\qs}\ c ] r4 /
for the code ( the slope adapted a mentioned Don with +4, for not disturbing to muxh
the midi)
and for making the midi better:
r8x3 c s1 e [u-2+4 ax3nf3-1 \tbu2\ cD s1 ] r4 /
The last 'cD' sounds to long, but this is hardly to hear on a piano. In any case the
synchronising
of the 2 hands is right.
And thanks for simulation of the trios with an adapted beat, this i should not have
found it myself.
Andre
(i uploaded this piece (componist Heller) )
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:11 AM
Subject: RE: [TeX-music] xtuplet in pmx ending with a rest
> You could get the beam angle a little better on the altered group with
>
> r8x3 c e [u ax3nf \tbu2\ c \def\tbu#1{\relax}\def\qb#1#2{\qs}\ e ]
>
> Also, note that in this special case there was no need to save and restore
> the original definitions of \tbu and \qb but this will not always be the
> case.
>
> --Don Simons
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:tex-music-admin@;sunsite.dk]On
> > Behalf Of Olivier Vogel
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 2:08 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [TeX-music] xtuplet in pmx ending with a rest
> >
> >
> > Producing a score that looks fine and producing a sound file that sounds
> > fine are very different tasks. The main task of PMX is the first one:
> > producing handily a beautiful score. The midi files produced by PMX are
> > essentially useful to detect the eventual errors in the score by hearing.
> >
> > So, I think you have to decide which aspect you want to privilege :
> > 1) the quality of the score (what realises the measure 1)
> > 2) or the quality of the sound file (what realises the measure 2)
> >
> > In fact, PMX serves the first task and not the second one. The better
> > solution is to use it for producing good score and to use another
> > program to
> > modificate manually the midi file got with PMX.
> >
> > Here is my proposition for your example:
> >
> > ====================
> > 2 1 2 4 2 4 0 -4
> > 1 2 20 .02
> >
> > bt
> > ./
> > w100m
> > % tempo = 60
> > It60ipipi
> > %1 looks right, sounds badly
> > a82 ze+ .ea a e /
> > r8x3 c e [u ax3nf \tbu2\ c \def\tbu#1{\relax}\def\qb#1#2{\qs}\ c ] r4 /
> >
> > %2 sounds right, looks badly (very differently)
> > % tempo = 60 * 1.5 = 90
> > It90
> > L2M
> > m12/1/12/16 a82d s a1d s e1d+ a8d e8d //
> > e83d s e1d s r1db r4db /
> > r1 [ c- e ] [u a c ] r r4d /
> > ====================
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Messenger : discutez en direct avec vos amis !
> > http://www.msn.fr/msger/default.asp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TeX-music mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
> _______________________________________________
> TeX-music mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
