I compiled a number of large (pmx)files. I saw nothing wrong

This is my system:
This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (MiKTeX 2.1) (preloaded format=plain 2002.12.28)  5 JAN 
2003 07:52
MusiXTeX(c) T.111 <3 Jan. 2003>
on WindowsXP and Winedt

And thanks for the beautiful program

Andre
(who did not know Finale was for free. I bought it once and could not work with it)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Taupin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mutex list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: [TeX-music] I want your tests


> Hello:
>   Appended if my proposal for a further version of musixtex.tex.
> Before posting it officially, I would like to as to all of you to test
> it, in place of the T109 ot T110 versions you may have. Some command
> structures have been changes and it does not fail in some of my
> examples, but other tests would be welcome.
> 
>   Note that this includes musixbm features, so that inclusion of musixbm
> of NOT useful, and even not recommended.
> 
>   It should be especially tested with HUGE tests, in order to check that
> it does not cause errors du to number of registers exhausted. But also
> with weird musics, under LaTeX.
> 
>  ---> Hope to get positive or failing answers. Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Daniel Taupin, 91400 ORSAY - France
>   E-mail= mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Home/fax: (33)1.60.10.26.44. Rep.: (33)1.60.10.04.13, fax (work)
> (33)1.69.15.60.86

_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to