Hello Daniel and all,
> Enclosed is (after a little correction solving a by problem from
> Cornelius Noack) a beta version of T111.
>
> Please test it with your most awfull music scores.
>
> Enclosed if also the source of updated musixdoc.tex, which you would be
> welcome to compile also (it is my most terrible test, but succeding
> things here might fail elsewhere...).
>
> Any corrections are welcome.
I tried new updated T.111 and musixdoc.tex with and without
musixpss v0.50;
I found no problem on my system except for some intentional(?)
"Overfull \hbox/\vbox", "Underfull \vbox".
(but what is the meaning of bold vertical rule in the margin
at section 2.16.1 ??)
Also, I tried this for some scores with Japanese lyrics generated
by M-Tx and PMX. It seems fine as previous versions were, too.
My current system:
TeX 3.14159
pTeX (a Japanized TeX by ASCII co.) 3.14159-p3.0.5
pdfTeX 3.14159-1.10a-betax-20021125
: distributed by A.Kakuto, based on teTeX and web2c-7.3.11
Win2000-sp2
BTW I found some changes of slur macro in T.109 and this T.111
in macro \writ@slur#1#2#3#4 . (adding \check@staff)
musixpss has not traced this change from T.108 (..T.99) to T.109 yet.
(= has not included \check@staff)
I can't guess the effect of this. For the time being it seems OK.
But possibly current musixpss might degrade the reliability of
T.109 and T.111 ??
I must research this.
The change from T.109 to T.111 seems to have no concern with musixpss.
---
As far as I know, MusiXTeX is the ONLY free musical typesetting
system with both excellent appearance and the compatibility with
handling the Japanese language.
Thank you again for your providing MusiXTeX.
Best regards,
----
Hiroaki MORIMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
