Hiroaki MORIMOTO wrote: >
> Also, I tried this for some scores with Japanese lyrics generated > by M-Tx and PMX. It seems fine as previous versions were, too. > > My current system: > TeX 3.14159 > pTeX (a Japanized TeX by ASCII co.) 3.14159-p3.0.5 > pdfTeX 3.14159-1.10a-betax-20021125 > : distributed by A.Kakuto, based on teTeX and web2c-7.3.11 > Win2000-sp2 > > BTW I found some changes of slur macro in T.109 and this T.111 > in macro \writ@slur#1#2#3#4 . (adding \check@staff) > > musixpss has not traced this change from T.108 (..T.99) to T.109 yet. > (= has not included \check@staff) > I can't guess the effect of this. For the time being it seems OK. \Check@staff checks that you do not say \notes \qu k|\qu l|\qu z\en for an instrument which only has 1 or 2 declared staffs. Otherwise, setting | instead of & often mades no visibles error... since the distance between instruments is the same as between stafs of a single instrument. But if you change one of them and not the other, there is a misleading vertical offset, so that your core becommes wrong. I experienced that trick. > But possibly current musixpss might degrade the reliability of > T.109 and T.111 ?? > I must research this. I do not thing so, the behaviour is the same, but some new features have geen added, and a few duplicate things removed. > > The change from T.109 to T.111 seems to have no concern with musixpss. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Daniel Taupin, 91400 ORSAY - France E-mail= mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home/fax: (33)1.60.10.26.44. Rep.: (33)1.60.10.04.13, fax (work) (33)1.69.15.60.86 _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
