Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
This just for the archives, not to reopen past arguments.

You may be confusing my musixtex preprosesssor (mpp) with LilyPond.
LilyPond has been a separate project from the start, borrowing only
the musixtex font during the first year (until 0.1.39).

thanks for clarifying:-)


When I needed to add some glyphs and wanted to make the number-glyhs
more to my liking, we found out that the licence did not allow us to
do so.  Requests for a more permissive licence were turned down.

After a heated discussion with all parties involved, Han-Wen and I
were given explicit, non-transferable permission*) to change the font.
That was a kind gesture, but we wanted our users to have the same
freedoms as ourselves, so we had to design our own font (which turned
out to be a very nice thing to do).

still for the record:


from at least version T110 of MusiXTeX the distribution has been accompanied by a document granting a GPL license to MusiXTeX. This should encompass the musixtex fonts as well


Greetings,
Jan.

*) By unsigned, private email, which was the most we could get, but
   which would not have been enough to be allowed distribution in
   Debian, for example.



--
Christian Mondrup, Computer Programmer
Scandiatransplant, Skejby Hospital, University Hospital of Aarhus
Brendstrupgaardsvej, DK 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Phone: +45 89 49 53 01 - http://www.scandiatransplant.org

_______________________________________________
Tex-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to