On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Francois Planiol-Auger wrote: > > Read also: > http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/doc/musixtex_export_appe > ndix.html > But maybe it can change...
As NotEdit developler I unfortunately have to answer: This does not help. The creation of an MusiXTeX-File is very complicated and NoteEdit does its best to do the job. But especially in case of more than one voice per staff it can happen that slurs cross other notes. I see no chance to write an export filter which really pays attention on it. The problem is: NoteEdit has to estimate what MusiXTeX will do. People who write MusiXTeX by hand use a trial-and-error loop. This approach isn't possible for NoteEdit. Actually, at the beginning my intention was: NoteEdit shall produce a skeleton, which a MusiXTeX user can complete. Meanwhile it produces viable results is many cases. But there is certainly a rest of scores which must be corrected by hand :-(( > I have not been able yet to edit the > -> MusixTex-ps-print file Don't try to edit the PostScript file. This is really very complicated. Edit the *.tex file! > -> Furthermore the printfile > -> contains some data that is not needed, like papersize, > -> "flushright" and some more things that are not necessary. The It is necessary! The "flushright" instructs the LaTeX processor to set the author and copyright information at the right hand side of the paper. Do you get an error ? If so: Perhaps you use "tex" instead of "latex". Actually MusiXTeX bases on TeX. But NoteEdit covers this with a LaTeX frame. The idea behind this is: You can add some music historical or music theoretical texts before and/or behind the score. -- J.Anders, Chemnitz, GERMANY ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Tex-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
