On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:22:14 +0100 "Andre Van Ryckeghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have here a discussion with (real) musiciens, who asked me to type some > music. I followed the default shape of > Don's pmx but they critize the number of beams on trios. They say the 3th > mesure on the example (commented with "wrong?" must have a beam. I known > that Don (always) is right but i put the question here to collect arguments > in the heavy discussion we have. > > So comments are welcome The behaviour of PMX is right: the second measure is correct, the third one is false. In the last measure of your example, the 4 under the beam is redundant and superfluous. Olivier _______________________________________________ Tex-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
