On Thu, 12 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 7:51:15 PM, you wrote:

      (3) It's quite courageous of you to start learning musixTeX
          with coding in straight musixTeX. You should by all means
          get familiar with PMX: it simplifies the use of musixTeX
          enormously (and that's an understatement).

That depends, though, on the types of scores you want to create. PMX, for perfectly understandable reasons, allows you to set only two voices per staff. To add a third voice (assuming you want independent stems, which, in the case of a three-voice Bach fugue for solo violin transcribed for guitar), you need to resort to inline TeX -- in other words, you need to learn raw MusixTeX in addition to PMX.

Of course you are right about that. But this whole thread started out
as help for a newbie -- so I'll rephrase: "Its quite courageous to
start your first steps in musixTeX with 3-voice per staff music --
if you like that better ;-)

I've always done all my typesetting in raw MusixTeX for precisely
this reason. In the end it's quicker than learning how to use the preprocessor.



I strongly disagree with that statement! (cf. your next comment) ...

BTW, re courage: Way back when, and with a fair bit of help from
this list, I not only ventured into straight MusixTeX, I also did
it with no prior knowledge of TeX (or any other programming
language). Given half a brain and sufficient attention span to
RTFM, it can be done. :)


I started out in musixTeX _exactly_ as you did [well, not quite: even further back, I spent my time with FORTRAN 66 ;-( ], and its that experience with leads me to the opinion opposite to yours.


Eva Jaksch

... who's wondering whether the "Writing/Processing MusixTeX files" section
of the HOWTO should be modified to include a more emphatic note to the
effect that Thou Shalt Not Use LaTeX to process MusixTeX scores or the
Mysterious Error Messages From Hell Shall Smite Thee, or something...

Well, I am somewhat split on that one. On the one hand, a stronger warning is certainly called for; nowadays LaTeX with its myriad of contributed packages has become so sophisticated that hardly anyone I know (with your honorable exception!) uses straight TeX for any other purpose than writing packages for LaTeX. So it happens all the time
that someone steps into that trap.


On the other hand, there are serious possibilities of combining the layout flexibilities provided by LaTeX with the beauty of musixTeX
(cf. Dirk Laurie's package txlatex, in particular). I would not like
to see people discouraged completely from using these tools. So a
warning in less biblically strong words might be called for.


ccn.

PS: discussing such issues with you, Eva, is always a pleasure, as
    they always have good, and practically useful, consequences!
--
.................................................................

  Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack          Phones:
  Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1       office   : +49 (421) 218-2427
  Universit"at Bremen               secretary: -2422
  Otto-Hahn-Allee                   Fax      : -4869
  D - 28334  Bremen                 home     : +49 (421) 34 22 36
                                                   Fax:  346 7872
  E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de   or  ccnoack at mailaps.org
  WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack
.................................................................

_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[email protected]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to