Hello, there are allways problems with source code in emails, not only lines wrongly cuted but also characters badly replaced/interpreted etc. In earlier times, we used uuencode/uudecode, and that was OK but rather complicated. why not put systemarticaly code into attached files? It is then transfered untouched and also easier to extract into the file system when received. I would strongly recommend this solution. Best regards, Paul
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Don Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Different mail systems work differently, but there are several possible > problems when cutting and pasting PMX (or TeX) code from email messages. > The > most common is lines being folded. You need to visually scan what you > pasted > and unfold where necessary. It's also possible though not likely that there > are extra characters at the beginning of each line, but this would > generally > only occur if you have cut something from what is already a reply. > > There was a flaw in Andre's solution. When I pointed it out, he privately > replied > > " i was stupid to use \ha it must be respectively \hl \hu \hl \hu" > > I haven't experimented with this substitution. > > --Don Simons > _____________________________________ > TeX-music mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music > -- **************************************************** Paul Bartholdi Chemin de la Barillette 11 CH-1260 NYON Suisse tel +41 22 361 0222 ****************************************************
_______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
