(Lack of) progress report:

1. In a Windows command window, I've succeeded in creating *.tex for all of
the *.mtx, using only commands starting with 

"for %a in (*."

In the process I figured out how to pass only the basenames of all *.pmx to
musixflx with

"for %a in (*.pmx) do musixflx %~na"

2. I've succeeded in creating *.ps for all those tex files, again using
"for" commands. But evidently my TeX system lacks the control sequence
\textit.

3. I got the latex compilation started. During that I had to let MiKTeX
install a bunch of packages it was missing. Then it even seemed to process
some of the inserted tex files after I included \usepackage{etex} as
suggested. But it choked on "\input netsoos1.tex". Looking in the makefile
it appears that this and various other *.tex are created on the fly by
merging various *.mta and *.mtb files. 

At that point it transitioned from adventure to slog, and I threw in the
towel, leaving the keys to this forbidden kingdom to the Unix gurus for the
time being.

--Don Simons

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>Behalf Of Don Simons
>Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:16 PM
>To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive'; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Compile error in M-Tx documentation
>
>I'm glad that the Linux-Unix-Debian-pdftex contingent can now sleep
>soundly. I also see exactly how the new PMX etex-demanding commands got
>into the mix (when the embedded examples were compiled with mtx/pmx).
>
>But there are still a few mysteries I'd like to pursue, for my own
>satisfaction if nothing else.
>
>They start with what happens when I try to compile mtxdoc according to
>Dirk's instructions. I didn't think makefiles had a place in the Windows
>command window, but to my surprise, when I unzipped mtxD060.zip and
>blindly typed
>
>make dvitarget && make config
>
>as instructed, I did not get nothing. Instead, I got
>
>ln -sf make-dvi make-target
>process_begin: CreateProcess((null), ln -sf make-dvi make-target, ...)
>failed.
>make (e=2): The system cannot find the file specified.
>make: *** [dvitarget] Error 2
>
>Verry interesting, but from this point on I'm clueless on this path.
>However, just for laughs I will try to compile the document using
>commands I do know about such as
>
>for %a in (*.mtx) do prepmx %a
>
>At the moment the next mystery is how to similarly send just the
>basenames as arguments to the musixflx command. Or maybe it'll work on
>*.mx1 ?
>
>--Don Simons
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>Behalf Of Roland Stigge
>>Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:46 AM
>>To: Werner Icking Music Archive; [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Compile error in M-Tx documentation
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>On 05/02/2011 05:33 PM, Simon Dreher wrote:
>>> it seems to work if you add the line
>>> \usepackage{etex}
>>> directly after the \documentclass[11pt]{article} line.
>>
>>Thanks for all your suggestions! Adding the above line to mtxdoc.tex,
>>halleluja.ltx and kanons.ltx fixes the problem. (Doing it the old
>>fashioned way as Don suggested would also work, but it wasn't necessary
>>in the end.)
>>
>>The attached patch fixes the Debian bug. Will upload later.
>>
>>bye,
>>  Roland
>
>
>
>-------------------------------
>[email protected] mailing list
>If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


-------------------------------
[email protected] mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to